A job that fetches $200,000 (₹1.65 crore) a year. Work only five hours a day! How?

Threads don’t work. Images don’t work. You need a very tight, expertly crafted 280-character take, said a ghost-writer who made $200,000 (₹1.64 crores approximately) writing tweets to Venture Capitalists, anonymous.

And that is not his day job. He works only five hours on a side hustle.

Wow! How?

Social media nowadays are abuzz with products appearing up front ‘bold and beautiful’ and a real-life seller who’s mostly unseen sits on the other side. All anonymous!

Anonymity on ‘X’ (formerly Twitter), guarantees a lucrative business now. All you should do is write a crisp 280-character tweet. And that’s it.

The tweets by an agreement pay the writer per tweet and some per month. The writer claims he was paid $100,000 for an original thread. Through thread, they announce big funding rounds.

That begs the question: Why do tweets cost a fortune?

The ghost-writer explains that funding on social media has changed.

Platforms such as X (formerly Twitter) have become the new landscape for funders and founders. They choose to visit these microblog sites for building a relationship and thereby grab the attention of the wider audience.

Funding now is no longer a one-to-one format, the ghost-writer says.

It’s a one-to-many format. You’re actually broadcasting to wider accounts. In one go!

While the writer is spending only a few hours, he says one should exercise a greater discipline with words.

His gospel: clarity, intention, and being concise.

And it doesn’t stop there.

It’s not just about a razor-sharp perfect tweet. It’s about understanding the nuance of the platform and who is engaging with a given account, what he calls; ‘being in on the joke’.

The writer attributes most of his success to understanding the intricacies of social media and how that helps build a relationship between funders and founders.

He says further that about 60% of the tweets he writes are “shit-posting” — meaning, the stuff you post when there’s nothing to post.

He says that “shit-posting” is the key to gaining attention and following. So much so that when there’s something real to post, you already have an audience. Clever job!

The writer is too strict. He delves on keeping boundaries, and told (an insider) that he’s had to fire clients before, as he doesn’t want his hustle-job to “take up too much space.”

Does he have an office?

No, he carries a laptop, a second phone, and a dedicated email address. And that’s all.

₹1.5 crore a year is no small money. And you work only five hours a day. Bindaas!

Source: http://www.entrepreneur.com

 

Kill the word ‘Youtuber’.

If you could permanently ban a word from general usage, which one would it be? Why?

You won’t miss a Youtuber today. He/she should be everywhere. Sitting next to your house, a co-traveller on the bus or on the tube, a parent right across the table filming their kid eating, a motorist whizzing past your car, a couple on the seashore posing against surging waves quite unmindful of you present and a cop filming himself issuing a ticket to you for a traffic violation. Bizarre!

They all have a mission on hand. Carry a smartphone, turn on the camera and start filming.

Film whatever moves and emits a noise on Earth.

And hell! You watch them coming up on screen in a jerky, jump-cut, jarring, boring and long video on YouTube, every day. Crazy!

Many cram their loudmouthed, dimwitted and cut-not-to-a-grammar production on another similar (madding crowd) platform called TikTok.

All have one thing in common. They’re amateurs. Not trained to shoot a video or checked through a well-scripted audition.

They call it citizen journalism.

As the media in the world have gradually evolved over many hundred years, from radio, print, television, digital and social media, people have suddenly seen an untapped space in independent media. A free space to say anything. Do anything. And show anything.

And address themselves proudly as ‘Youtubers’.

That’s alarming!

But freedom of speech has often been misused here. Scholars debate now if censorship should be enforced on these free-roaming citizen-journos who show no regard to the ethics of filmmaking.

The debate is raging. And for that reason, therefore, please ban the word ‘Youtuber’ from general usage. Period.

Far from the Madding Crowd.

What an investment of $100 can bring in this AI-ridden world? An experiment.

Dear ChatGPT, 

You have $100, and the goal is to turn that into as much money as possible in the shortest time possible, without doing anything illegal. I will do anything you say.

16 March 2023.

That was the question Jackson Fall put to ChatGPT and posted it on X (formerly Twitter).

Can AI help invest money in a business and help build an online empire is the move behind the exercise.

This tweet set the internet on fire and there were 23 million views and over two thousand replies.

The AI social media enthusiasts have sat through hours following updates in a thread.

ChatGPT, to start with, asked Fall to create a website. He created a blog site by the name GreenGadgetGuru.com.

The plan was to set up an affiliate marketing and try positioning eco-friendly content. The AI suggested positioning sustainable living products on the site.

Many on SM were thrilled by this experiment, and Fall said this exercise quickly brought over 7,700 dollars worth of donations.

All for a cause. Can AI run a business that generates profit?

A month was gone. The update showed it did generate revenue. $130 was there for all to see.

But Fall said that it looked fishy as there was no advertising done nor were there proofs of sale. How did it show the figure?

Eight months have gone. No reply from Fall. No updates.

Some questioned if that was the case of a stunt.

Some asked; what if they gave ChatGPT $100K?

Some found fault with the design of the blog site, complaining it wasn’t mobile-friendly.

The wait for those who invested in this experiment isn’t over yet.

Buzz on this blog if you heard anything from Fall. 

His X handle is @jacksonfall 

Is Twitter real? How would Elon Musk get rid of spam on Twitter by charging a fee? You don’t need a blue-check verification to say you’re ‘blue-checked” on Twitter. How bizarre!

Food for thought. Never lose appetite for filming. 👍